In this modern age, we have access to so much information that it is hard to keep it all straight. This has led me to feel a pull in my prayer life to return to the basics, to go back to the Bible. I have felt a desire to identify all the extraneous elements in my philosophy and attempt to discard them. I have noticed that many others are fumbling along with me in their own attempts to do the same.
I have chosen the term “Retrogression” to describe this process: a return to the original or to the origin.
Returning to the source material is invaluable for maintaining accuracy, particularly in an age where information is readily available and often subject to distortion. This principle applies across various fields, including academia, journalism, science, and religion. By going back to the original sources, we can ensure the integrity of the information we use and disseminate, fostering a culture of authenticity and reliability.
One of the primary values of returning to the source material is the preservation of context. Original documents, recordings, or other primary sources provide the context that is often lost in summaries or interpretations. When we rely solely on secondary sources, we risk missing nuanced details and misinterpreting the material. For example, historical texts or scientific studies contain specific methodologies, assumptions, and cultural settings that are crucial for accurate interpretation. Without this context, our understanding becomes superficial and potentially misleading.
Another significant value is the prevention of misinformation. In the digital age, information can be easily manipulated, whether intentionally or accidentally. Misquotes, selective editing, and biased reporting can distort the original message. By accessing the source material directly, we can verify the authenticity of the information, cross-check facts, and form well-rounded opinions. This practice is essential in journalism, where the accuracy of reported facts can influence public opinion and policy.
Returning to the source material also promotes intellectual honesty and rigor. In academia, referencing primary sources demonstrates a commitment to scholarly standards and provides a solid foundation for research. It allows scholars to build upon existing knowledge accurately and transparently, contributing to the advancement of their fields. For students, learning to engage with primary sources cultivates critical thinking skills and a deeper understanding of the subject matter.
In the realm of religion, returning to foundational texts can offer clarity and unity. For example, in Christianity, returning to the Bible, the primary source of the faith, helps believers understand the core tenets and teachings without the filter of centuries of theological interpretation and denominational doctrines. This direct engagement with the scripture can foster a more personal and authentic faith experience, as individuals grapple with the text themselves rather than relying on potentially biased intermediaries.
Moreover, revisiting original materials can correct past misunderstandings and update knowledge based on new interpretations or discoveries. In science, for instance, re-examining primary research data with modern techniques can lead to new insights and breakthroughs. Similarly, historians can uncover previously overlooked aspects of historical events by studying original documents in light of contemporary perspectives.
The process of returning to source material is also a safeguard against the dilution of information over time. As ideas are transmitted through various channels, they can become oversimplified or altered. This is particularly evident in the digital age, where information is often condensed into easily consumable formats, such as social media posts or sound bites. While these formats are convenient, they can strip away the complexity and depth of the original material. Engaging directly with the source material ensures that we retain the richness of the information and appreciate its full scope.
Not Deconstruction
Some of us are throwing out the baby with the bathwater. I believe the deconstruction trend of a few years ago is an example of this. We must guard against complete deconstruction and make clear distinctions between sound biblical doctrine taught by the apostles (Acts 2:42) and classical, traditional, or even orthodox doctrines that may be old but not directly from the Bible.
Inevitable Starting Place
For me, this starts with a return to an inerrant Bible and a rejection of critical scholarship concerning it. I have been on this path for some time, but recently I found a scholar who has dedicated himself to it. His book “Then He Poked the Bear” by Peter Van Kleeck is a great representation of this Retrogression.
Sacred Cows
All of us have certain sacred cows that we wrestle with letting go of, but the desire is there. I certainly do not agree with everything the people on this list teach, and they do not agree with each other. I can imagine that some might even be appalled to appear on a list together. But my point is that I recognize a theme: an honest desire to abandon the doctrines of men and the Towers of Babel.